51st ATF2 meeting

July 11 14:30- 16:30, Rm.425 bldg.3 at KEK.

1. Layouts of Zero-Crossing Extraction, Feed-Forward Correction, and Fast Feedback Stabilisation at the ATF2, Alexander Kalinin (ASTEC Daresbury Laboratory CCLRC

file , pdf (18 pages, 488kB ) and ppt

Following three systems are explained in order to maintain the beam quality at ATF2. The first one is zero crossing system to extract beam when it cross the zero energy point in the energy oscillation in DR. Second, Feed Forward (FF) system has latency of 400ns from DR to EXT to correct transverse jitter in DR. Third, Feed Back (FB) has latency of 300 (150)ns to correct the extraction-kicker jitter.

Locations of elements are searched for based on the v3.6 optics (MAD). All of them are located at upstream of diagnostic section . Common elements of FF and FB are a pair of kickers with pickups and a pair of pickup in each direction of x and y, i.e. a pair for (x,x') or (y,y'). Kickers are 30cm long striplines and pickups are 15cm long stripline BPMs. Total length of a kicker with a pickup is 50cm including flanges. The optimum phase advance in a kicker pair or a pickup pair is 90 degree. One pickup (P3 in x ) is the same one at the first kicker (Ky1). So, there are 4 kickers and 7 pickups in total. All the pickups must have position resolution of 1um for small beta function .

For FF, there are two pickups in DR, which are stripline BPMs. Pickup 1 is downstream of Q6 in LQ6C (93.05m), pickup 2 is downstream of Q17 in LZV43 (115.63m)

For zero crossing (ZC), Orbit DR pickups are used: LRBPM13.9 and LRBPM2.28.

Finally, a FF/FB prototype is suggested for short cut to stabilize y only at the present EXT. It consists of a kicker and three BPMs. The kicker is placed downstream of QD8. BPMs are ML11, ML13 and ML14 for monitoring the extraction kicker jitter, feedback signal and witness, respectively. Performance of this prototype may be obscured by the extraction kicker jitter.

2. Effect of Multi-Pole Component of QM7R on Emittance in ATF EXT, Shigeru KURODA (KEK)

file , pdf (4 pages, 331kB ), ppt (199kB)

First, he commented that the fitted multipole B fields, which has been presented by A.Seryi, should not be used to calculate the field felt by beam in DR for too large there.

He estimated emittance growth by each multipole components of 12, 10, 8 and 6 pole as a function of |xo|< 1cm, |yo| and &sigma&delta < 0.1%, where xo,yo are position of extracted beam ( from the design orbit) and &sigma&delta is momentum spread (RMS).

Results show very small effect on the emittance, while the 10 and 8 poles have slightly stronger dependence on xo,yo .

3. Elegant vs MAD, Feng Zhou (SLAC)

file , pdf (11 pages, 2.7MB ), ppt (2.3MB )

Previously, the Elegant results have been presented for the ATF2-EXT-line simulations. Elegant can estimate the multipole effect only up to n=3, which might be enough for QM7, but the higher order components would significantly contribute at both QM7 and SepA. Therefore, new MAD tracking results were compared with the Elegant ones.

His summary is listed below;

Questions, answers and comments are listed below;

2. KEK site meeting ( in Japanese )

The next ATF2 meeting will be held on 18th July 2007, 2:30pm -, 3-gokan, 425, KEK, TV-ID#=31110 with the KEK Gatekeeper and ILC Webex.