Technical coordinators
   Should they collect engineering studies of each detector ?

What is the integration task ?
   - structure of sub-detector
   - support structure


Iwashita,  permanent QD0
  ATF2　50mm dis  - ILC   20mm dia.    physical 24mm
   extraction 用hole    14mr  4m  56mm  50 70mm from the beam line
  non-magnetic  device at ILC

  QD0 dipole,  SD0  SQ,   to talk to Brett at Sendai
      1mm adjustment for push-pull
 
anti-solenoid   200kN

5 ring for partial anti-solenoid
optics needs anti-solenoid

beam への影響　axial  u =1.05

28トン  - 11トン（irn shield) = 12トン→  1トン　（iron shieldを長くした）
anti-solenoid   in/out the support tube
Q ;  iron shield thickness
A ;  6cm程度（コイルと合わせて10cm）
Q :  iron shieldとanti-solとのconnect?

Q : anti-solenoid is needed for the optics ?

Q : iron shieldはanti-solenoidの磁場を吸収してしまう
A : anti-solenoidはironがsaturationしないようにするもの

C :  anti-solenoid      -  coupling correctionを助けるもの
　　how much is difficult issues
A : Brett scheme  , LCWS2007, DESY
        62 ton  →　　double coil  


Suetsugu,  wakefield of beam pipe
 loss factor  4 x 10^13  v,s, 4 x 10^14
simple geometry
 step - in/out  Mafia cal.
    in  -3.8 x 10^10      -  small
    out   7.4 x 10-12       -  formulas  7.8 x 10-12

xubtraction method  
   7 x 10^12  ( Lc > 2m )   式　分母=2  山本氏 = 4

  long taper     no radiation  , so 分母=4

cone  loss factor  
    mesh size  0.2mm   in = out = 1 x 10^14

Q : in  aとbの間の角？　　exponential形状では？
A : 試してみる

Q : ゲインは計算精度誤差か？
A : 違う

Kawai
   1/4 model  GLD  12 角形
　3d  磁場解析  8000A,  2.0167 x 10^7 A/turn  2.8T
   中心部分の3d 磁場分布　　東北大　
Q :mesh  size   
A : 0.1m,  0.5m 鉄    計算機で制限
Q : 2dとの違い、電流密度を上げたとき？
A
Q : 鉄 12 角形、空気 シリンダー

Q : computer power ?
A : memory  4 G,  mesh 4時間, 32 bit   解析 1h

Q : 

3/5  2h  
introduction
MDI/Integ  WG status report
optimization
cost WD

3/6  2h
tools  software,  engineering tools ( CAD,

3/7
   ILD design
      - tracker support integration,  global shape 8 or 12
      - optional detectors