Shintake monitor meeting, 24 December 2008
Participants : Y.Kamiya, T.Yamanaka and M.Oroku ( Tokyo university )
J.Urakawa, N.Terunuma, S.Kuroda, T.Okugi, S.Araki (KEK)
1. Background exceeded the signals.
- N (Background) v.s. ICT has no correlation
- N/S > 10 ( during experiments, S/N was thought to be 1 )
- scan +/- 1.4mm in X , laser beam observed by PIN
- scan for 16.8nsec
- shower developments
low energy background dominated, so both distributions becomes same
difference due to the beam conditions?
the same distributions
observed background from the screen at right after the EXT, i.e. MS1X
- Q : shower shape?
- A : can not analyzed, too much background for the analysis
- could not align with the beam
- Q : How to estimate the S and N ? - normalization ?
- A : RMS distribution in the histograms to separate S and N
- Q : What is difference from the previous experiment using the LW setup last year?
- A : the shower development of the background is different,
- A : PMTs in the detector system have been calibrated with cosmic rays.
S was estimated by intensities of lasers and beams
- Q : Shower shape was observed with lower PMT-HVs ( gains ) ?
- A : no in this time
- Q : Did the detector properly worked during the experiments ?
S/N must be correctly estimated during experiments.
- Q : Understanding of background :
where do they come ? front or back or up or down or right or left
the beam condition must be controlled
- A : Those experiments were not for the background study.
large area for Pb shields;
installation of a screen monitor for further studies ;
measurement of OTR/ODR and laser beam at the same detector ( APD )
- Q : screen - mm position information ;
laser random reflection
- A Okugi : measurement of laser beam and ODR from 45 degree knife edge by a APD ( LW group )
- Q : Can you install all instruments in the vacuum pipe with limited number of ports?
screen, knife edge, etc.
- A : position adjustment by a screen monitor ( mm order )
- C : laser pulse width 8ns FWHM, so position information must be better in mm order
- A : alignment target with pin holes ( 174, 30, 8, 2 degree modes ) instead of slit ; holes with 200um diameter
- Q : You must prepare the performance, detailed procedures
Is it possible for multiple purposes ?, i.e. both for 2 and 8 degree modes
- A : Is it possible to align the beam to 200um pin hole ?
- C : it is difficult to tune beam in a hole.
We will prepare followings;
- Pb shield
- long front collimator
- screen monitor
- cubic alignment target for 2, 8, 30, 174 degree modes
Alignment of beam line in the detector ?
- Can we use a laser beam to simulate the beam line ?
- beam trajectory can be measured by screens ?
new screen at IP ( and just in front of IP-BSM) must be used;
- Q : aperture of collimator ?
- A : 20mm diameter in the long collimator
- Q : scan range in X ?
- A : it is difficult to increase the range, but it can be 2.5mm by beam scan
- C : not good to change the magnet currents
- Q : Is it enough with +/- 4mm in total ?
- A : First, we try the beam scan, probably to use the upstream magnets for wider scan in parallel as much as possible, i.e. 10mm ?
- Q : angular acceptance of the collimator ?
- A : tunable,
- Q : Do we know the present beam trajectory ?
- A :No ( precisely )
- C : 20mm collimator would be enough w/o sextupoles since the initial alignment should be good ( < mm ).
- Q: How to insure the beam position in the IP vacuum pipe ?
- Q : Can you adjust laser beams for 10mm positions ?
- A : It is possible to move the optics with +/- 10mm.
- Q : Laser waist position ( +/- a few mm ) can be aligned ?
- Q : Do we need vertical scan?
- A : the laser focus must be changed
- Q : Do you monitor the waist position ?
- A : we can not.
- Q : What plan will be in February -March ?
- A : Master theses; final review on 20 January,
- Q : IP-BSM signals can be available at the ATF control room for beam tuning ?
- A : We will prepare such signals.
- Q : The signals must be available for non-experts.
- C : Somebody must accompany in beam tuning time.
- A : We need strong support from the optics ( beam tuning) group for the moment.
- Q : What is your plan by February?
- A : Target - screen and folders were ordered by Yamanaka.
ODR-target and the LW actuator will be borrowed from Stewart
laser cubic target to KEK machine shop
- A : We will borrow the spares . ( i.e. remote controllable actuator )
In this time, no ODR target, but only the actuator
ports for screen/actuator, camera
- C : Screen at IP and correct S/N estimation are important
- Q : You need EPICS installation in your LINUX to communicate with the control system
just for data transformation for realtime monitor
the installation by Terunuma/ATF and new PC ( rack-mount )
- A : no special software is used. VME driver, GPIB library
- Q : Support of the detector will be ordered by ATF ( Terunuma )
Can you de-mount the detector?
- A : We will do it in a week of 26th January.
- Q : Send drawing of setup of detector.
- C : background monitor is essential, which can be used for tuning, i.e. knob
- A : Optics of 2 and 8 degree modes will be commissioned in February.
- Q : Can we use it to measure the beam size ?
- A : No. It takes more time.
- C : You should explain clearly the availability of IP-BSM for beam tuning with beam size measurement.
- Q : How long dose it take to commissioning the optics with 2 and 8 modes? ,
One month ?
- A : position sensitive detector at downstream is missing at present.
- Q : When will you get PSDs?
- A : We can transport laser beams and get the interference. But, the laser position can not be measured w/o PSD.
- A : It costs 400,000 yen/set (PSD and electronics) times 4 for 2, 8, 30, 174 degree modes
So, it is 1,600,000 yen in total.
, where
2,8,30 with the same 2 PSDs-set.
174 with the second 2 PSDs-set.
- Q : the appointed date of delivery
- A : 2-3 weeks
- C : buy 2sets.
- Q : What the PSD is for?
- A : To monitor the laser position for each mode.
Those are also used when one change the crossing modes.
- Q : 75nm beam size needs 30 degree mode ( 80nm - 400nm).
- A : We can start the 30 deg. commissioning, first.
- A : 2 and 8 degree modes can be compared with the carbon wire scanner.
- Q : signal sensitivity with 2 and 8 degree compared to the laser wire scanner?
- A : it is half.
- Q : Are you available on 7th January ?
- A : Yes
The same pulse width ( 8ns FWHM ) both in LW and interference .