TEB Notes - 15th Oct

LCWS (John, Marc)
* TDR wrap-up session on Wed
-- three sessions: plenary, then parallel sessions on addressing issues, then prep for PAC review
* TDR wrap-up sessions
-- authors, contributors, editors, ec assignees, PMs
-- Generate list of issues and distribute before LCWS
Some of the remaining issues (Marc):
-- CM testing
-- cavity yield presentation
-- 10Hz operation
-- CFS construction and power parameters
-- S1 G and System tests
-- 400+ ednotes (Who goes through these??)

TLE
* (List of comments) - some big items
-- Can't address the big items in the next two weeks. What to do?
-- PAC review is principally on the design (TDR2)? Does this allow us to spend some additional time to work on TDR1?? Probably not - TDR2 relies on TDR1 for supporting evidence

Figures still also need to be fixed - either poor quality, or missing?

Akira (TDR2/ML issues resolution)
Has communicated with authors on issues to be addressed in TDR2/ML.
* Akira will work on infrastructure part (written by Kerby)
* Move part of cavity section text from TDR1 to cavity section in TDR2 - specific sections/subsections identified by Rongli
* Paulo uploaded update of CM section from Akira's comments on pdf
* New material on quad specifications written
* Description on HOM absorbers written
* Peterson 
* Half of answers to Nick's comments are being worked on, or responses have already been provided
* Who at KEK can assist Akira to make the changes to the TeX?

Nick: very important we know who is editing the document. We need to know who is doing what (with Ch3). All responses from Akira's team are in email, with exception of CM updates which were uploaded to forge as a new TeX file. Nobody else is working on the TeX directly

Nick: we need dedicated meetings on SCRF chapters to go through comments one by one and fix
-- information to come from Akira's team via Akira

Top-level items: the PMs to decide what to do about them and probably to address them directly