CALICE and Diversity - Meeting ad-hoc panel

Thursday 7 Jan 2021, 13:45 → 15:45 Europe/Zurich

Roman Pöschl is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.

Topic: Roman Pöschl's Personal Meeting Room

Join Zoom Meeting
https://ijclab.zoom.us/j/8649231402?pwd=N1NJL1F2dmFxRE9CM2JEUkx6USthQT09

Meeting ID: 864 923 1402
Passcode: 148313
One tap mobile
+33170950350,,8649231402#,,,,*148313# France
+33186995831,,8649231402#,,,,*148313# France

Dial by your location
        +33 1 7095 0350 France
        +33 1 8699 5831 France
        +33 1 7037 2246 France
        +33 1 7037 9729 France
        +33 1 7095 0103 France
Meeting ID: 864 923 1402
Passcode: 148313
Find your local number: https://ijclab.zoom.us/u/ayxEgDA9n

Join by SIP
8649231402@zoomcrc.com

Join by H.323
162.255.37.11 (US West)
162.255.36.11 (US East)
115.114.131.7 (India Mumbai)
115.114.115.7 (India Hyderabad)
213.19.144.110 (Amsterdam Netherlands)
213.244.140.110 (Germany)
103.122.166.55 (Australia)
64.211.144.160 (Brazil)
69.174.57.160 (Canada)
207.226.132.110 (Japan)
Meeting ID: 864 923 1402
Passcode: 148313

answers-diversitywg.pdf

Link to Diversity Charter

======================= Draft =====================================

Minutes of ad-hoc panel on Diversity Charter 7/1/21

Attendees: F. Simon, L. Linssen, F. Corriveau, T. Suehara, M. R. Manzano, L. Masetti, R.P.

• Observations:
  • General support to the values expressed in the Charter and independently of signing or not the Charter the topic should be addressed in CALICE (see action items)  
  • Still no clear picture of consequences of signing in case the analysis by ... whoever ... results in non-compliance
    • Not clear who has mandated the Diversity Group and who will be mandated with the analysis of the and with drawing conclusions
  • Signing the Charter may subject CALICE to surveillance by a (still unknown) committee. On the other hand it is likely that we will become part panels in which the topic (and our data?) will be discussed. 
  • In general more communication on the topic between JENA and the relevant collaborations is desirable (at the example of the Recognition WG)
  • In connection with the previous item, what is the political impact of signing or not signing?  
• Actions:
  • Poll at other collaborations (Big LHC Collaborations but also others) whether they have signed or are intending to sign the Charter
    • Side remark 1: neither Lucia nor Francois as ATLAS members have a memory that the Charter has been discussed in ATLAS
    • Side remark 2: Slides of Jorgen D'Hondt at last ECFA Meeting suggest a cautious feedback by the community
  • Before signing we may want to suggest changes to the Charter, for this, the poll mentioned above might be useful
    • The general feeling was that signing the Charter w/o Sec. 3 or at least w/o the last sentence would be less of a problem  
  • Independently of signing or not the Charter, CALICE may want to start the collection of relevant data to get a picture on in CALICE Diversity on its own (see also next bullet)
    • In case of signing the charter we discourage indivdual members to fill out the survey but will collect the data centrally
  • CALICE may setup its own Diversity Charter taking example at the ECFA--NUPECC-APPEC Charter
    • Internal follow up in CALICE yet to be defined (true in all cases)

 

 

13:45 → 13:55 Introduction

Speaker: Roman Poeschl (Université Paris-Saclay (FR))

talk070121.pdf

13:55 → 14:55 Discussion