Login

CALICE and Diversity - Meeting ad-hoc panel

→ Europe/Zurich
Description

Roman Pöschl is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting.

Topic: Roman Pöschl's Personal Meeting Room

Join Zoom Meeting
https://ijclab.zoom.us/j/8649231402?pwd=N1NJL1F2dmFxRE9CM2JEUkx6USthQT09

Meeting ID: 864 923 1402
Passcode: 148313
One tap mobile
+33170950350,,8649231402#,,,,*148313# France
+33186995831,,8649231402#,,,,*148313# France

Dial by your location
        +33 1 7095 0350 France
        +33 1 8699 5831 France
        +33 1 7037 2246 France
        +33 1 7037 9729 France
        +33 1 7095 0103 France
Meeting ID: 864 923 1402
Passcode: 148313
Find your local number: https://ijclab.zoom.us/u/ayxEgDA9n

Join by SIP
8649231402@zoomcrc.com

Join by H.323
162.255.37.11 (US West)
162.255.36.11 (US East)
115.114.131.7 (India Mumbai)
115.114.115.7 (India Hyderabad)
213.19.144.110 (Amsterdam Netherlands)
213.244.140.110 (Germany)
103.122.166.55 (Australia)
64.211.144.160 (Brazil)
69.174.57.160 (Canada)
207.226.132.110 (Japan)
Meeting ID: 864 923 1402
Passcode: 148313

Hide

CALICE sub-panel on Diversity Charter, Meeting 28/9/21

Attendees: F. Simon, L. Masetti, F. Corriveau, L. Linssen, K. Krüger, M.C. Fouz, T. Suehara, J. Maalmi, R.P.

  •  There was general consensus about the positive progress concerning the Charter in particular that the actual   Charter and the document on monitoring have been separated from each other.
  • Two points need clarification
    • Second bullet point in Sec. 2: The way it is written, ensuring a balanced composition of committees if overarching entities like APPEC, ECFA, NuPECC) and in collaborations etc. is mixed in in this one bullet point and we would like to split it into two distinct bullet points
    • Handling of changes to the Charter: There are two possible ways a) Changes are proposed by APPEC, ECFA, NuPECC assemblies and signatories of the Charter are asked for approval b) A new version of the Charter is proposed for signature to the international community. The text below the bulleted list is not clear about that.   
  • It was confirmed that it is preferable that CALICE collects itself the information for the monitoring of relevant parameters and decides how to pass it on to the corresponding committees for statistical evaluation
  • It follows that CALICE has to set up a way to collect the information. For this mainly five questions have to be clarified
    • Which information (first approach are the monitoring variables listed in the supplementary document on moniroting of the Charter)? 
    • How to render it simple and efficient to collect the information? 
    • How to seek agreement that the information is collected by the CALICE Management?
    • How to make sure that we comply with international regulations and laws?   
      • We have to be transparent on what happens to the information
    • How to manage the information? Lucie has agreed to survey whether CERN offers corresponding database services.

==================================================================================================================================================================

Draft Mail to Diversity Group.

Dear Members of the Diversity Group and Chairs of APPEC, ECFA and NuPECC,

in CALICE we have discussed the new version of the Diversity Charter of the 11th of May 2021 that was sent to us on the 23rd of June 2021.

Let us first thank the Diversity Group and the APPEC, ECFA, NuPECC managements that the new version of the Charter and the revised way of data monitoring replies to our concerns we had to the first draft of the Charter. The new version has been received very positively by CALICE. We have, however, two further points that require from our point of view further clarification:

1) Second bullet in Sec.2 of the Charter: We propose to split this bullet point into two separate points. One in which the collaborations, conferences etc. are encouraged to help ensuring a balanced composition of the committees in overarching bodies (such as APPEC, ECFA, NuPECC) and a second one in which they are encouraged to ensure a balance within their own entity. We have the impression that this second bullet points mixes these things, which renders this point very unclear. 

2) Section 2, text below the bullet points: We would like to ask to formulate more precisely how a new version of the Charter is dealt with. From our point of view there are two ways a) Changes are implemented by APPEC, ECFA, NuPECC assemblies and signatories of the Charter are asked for approval or b) a new version of the Charter is proposed for signature to the community.   

Before we will take the decision on whether or not to sign the Charter we would like to ask you to address these two points in a new version.

Best regards,

Roman Pöschl

There are minutes attached to this event. Show them.
Powered by Indico v3.3.5-pre