*****************************************************
(each item starts with the person who raised question or comment and the persons who answered or gave response if there were)
(note: 1. page number if appeared refers to Tomohiko’s talk; 2. “HOMEWORK” if appeared means work needs be done relatively quickly; though responsible person for each homework is not always clearly written here, it should be becoming clear rather soon.)
a.) K.Fujii: general comments that importance of top physics should be enhanced.
b.) Y.Okada: response to several related concern about the running scenario of ILC to be presented, we should first focus on NP at 500 GeV ILC which is the proposal (staging from 250 GeV is included by default), then add another set of NP opportunities at all lifetime of ILC, e.g. including1 TeV ILC, gam-gam collider option.
c.) K.Hidaka: deviation of coupling Hcc to SM value could be larger due to QFV, which is very difficult to be discovered at LHC, but can be a good opportunity at ILC.
d.) K.Fujii: do we need add more explanation to the plot of Higgs coupling deviation pattern in MCHM5 (page 14), i.e. some basics about the composite models?
e.) Y.Okada: the DM relic abundance estimated from LHC measurement has been excluded (page 49), we should update that plot by using ILC measurements only to calculate DM relic abundance. (HOMEWORK)
f.) K.Fujii: in SUSY chargino and neutralino precision mass measurement (page 32) which was done at LoI, the assumed model parameter has been excluded, it’s urgent to update that simulation study. (HOMEWORK)
g.) M.Nojiri: regarding model independent NP search, we need update search of heavier scalar boson via e+e- ―> ZS, setting cross section limitat different energies for different scalar mass. (HOMEWORK)
h.) K.Fujii & Y.Okada & S.Kanemura: regarding the possible output, opportunity matrix, which was discussed in last general physics meeting, S.Kanemura is going to prepare a first version of opportunity matrix from theoretical point of view taking into account possible yields of LHC run 2, supposed to be presented at coming ILC Summer Camp. (HOMEWORK)
i.) K.Fujii & S.Kanemura: regarding the approach to probe composite Higgs model (page 17), we need make that plot more understandable, i.e. what is m*, and possibly indicate connection to models with extra dimension.
j.) T.Tanabe & M. Nojiri & K.Fujii: for the impact of composite Higgs models on top sector (page 19), we need put current experimental constraints on that plot (top coupling deviation pattern for various models). (HOMEWORK)
k.) T.Tanabe & Y.Okada & S.Kanemura & K.Fujii: how can we improve the plot of coupling ratio (HWW/Hbb) deviation versus heavier Higgs mass (page 23)? It’s actually not tree-level calculation, radiation correction from Higgs potential has been calculated in the coupling ratio; but the MSSM (mainly 2HDM part) prediction line is only for one specific model parameter, we need add more prediction lines on that plot corresponding to more parameter space. Another question is how we can select the lines? (HOMEWORK)
l.) T.Tanabe & Y.Okada: how can we show better the comparison of LSP search at ILC versus gluino search at LHC (page 30), do we need assume the mass relation at mSUGRA and AMSB? we can use similar strategy in the plot of neutralino mass versus gluino mass in page 45, by adding various model lines. (HOMEWORK)
m.) J.Tian & Y.Okada: what’s the long term plan? in addition to the short term goal for MEXT presentation, we need continuously prepare and improve NP search at ILC in particular we need quick response in case of any new ex periment result from LHC run 2, or any new request fromdecision makers; for middle term plan we need present some output from this task force at LCWS14.
n.) J.Tian: most of NP search in current talk are indirect search from precision measurements of Higgs and top couplings, we can think about more direct searches, i.e. heavier Higgs discovery in extended Higgs sector.
o.) K.Fujii: we need finish up still missing Higgs related analyses (being updated with Higgs mass of 125 GeV). (HOMEWORK)
p.) general: more discussion can be carried on at coming 10th meeting of Toyama New Higgs Working Group (July 12-13).
q.) general: it's very important to keep the ongoing effort within international collaboration framework, and be coordinated together with LCC physics working group.
*****************************************************
